So OK,
We are all budding astrologers, here. We all know that "Sun signs are just the tip of the iceberg" when it comes to personality, and/or trying to figure out a person's "sign." There are all sorts of technicalities to look out for: Sun sign in one sign (and it's particular ruling element), but a cluster of planets in a different sign (and/or element), the person's moon sign and/or rising sign in a different sign, the person's upbringing, genetics, yadda-yadda-yadda. You get the point.

Yet, with all of this, us budding astrologers *still* have our moments where we can meet someone (without spending a significant amount of time with them), and pinpoint *exactly* what their Sun sign match is. That's one of the fun little perks of getting into astrology; guessing someone's Sun sign.

However, I've noticed a little bit of a pattern (at least in *my* experience); out of the many times I've put myself to the test of trying to determine someone's *sign*; Libras were--hands down--the *hardest* for me to pinpoint. I've accurately pinpointed many Virgos, Scorpios, Capricorns (and many others, too), but Libras don't always come out the way you expect them to. It's usually not until after I've spent a significant amount of time with the person, and/or after the person flat out tells me their birthdate, that I find out they are Libra. I've also noticed this pattern (but in much less terms) in some Gemini's, some Pisces, Aquarius (and a few Scorpios). I find when I come across many Libras, it's hard to tell which "sign" they seem the most like; almost like I have a hard time choosing between 3 or 4 (sometimes more) signs. Sometimes, they flat out don't seem like *any* of the signs. Again, I've found that many times when I play this "guessing" game, and after some time, I still can't quite come to a firm choice, more often than, not, they turn out to be Libras (and lesser times, the other 4 signs I mentioned turn out to be the case). I think I have an idea why this may be:

For Libras, it could be because quite a few of them have a highly vacillating nature (inwardly, not necessarily on outward terms), while some cleverly know how to camouflage their thoughts/feelings/motives/personality (whether it's behind a cool-calm-collected poise, or behind an air of chic, or at the total other end of the spectrum - and trust me, it's there - behind an air of toughness, sometimes outright aggression.) Libras are all over the freakin' place--there are *so* many kinds of them (yeah, I know, that can be said of any sign, but I see it here, more than anywhere else).

For Gemini's, it's probably for the obvious--they are supposed to be dualistic, so they seemingly change on the drop of a hat.

For Aquarius, well, they're supposed to be weird as hell, and unpredictable, and at times, it shows.

For Pisces I think because they are the last sign of the zodiac, so they are supposed to have a little bit of all the signs that came before it (and likewise, they are said to standout from the other signs, alongside that.)

And for the even fewer Scorpios where I encountered this kind of situation, it may be due to the fact that Scorpios *are* supposed to be the most...mysterious... and...hidden...

There should be some interesting responses to this topic. Nothing necessarily worth taking *too* seriously, it was just a fun little experiment that I thought I'd share with the other members on this tribe.